What we deliver

Four service lines, mapped to how government writes tenders. Each engagement is scoped under Statement of Work with defined deliverables.

Programme / project delivery

Embedded delivery lead for complex programmes. From stabilisation through to completion. We take accountability for programme outcomes, not just activity.

Principal-led delivery. Every engagement is run directly by a senior practitioner with 20+ years of programme delivery across public and private sectors. When structural patterns have compounded — change fatigue, authority gaps, governance debt — we diagnose and fix, not just manage.

When you need this

  • Programme at risk or in recovery
  • Delivery lead gap on critical path
  • Complex multi-vendor coordination
  • Structural failures compounding across workstreams

What we deliver

  • Programme plan and schedule
  • Risk register and escalation framework
  • Status reporting and stakeholder management
  • Vendor coordination and accountability

Engagement model

SOW, embedded, or fractional

Procurement advisory

Requirements definition, RFI/RFQ development, vendor evaluation, and contract negotiation for clinical systems and ICT. We design procurement processes that are defensible, auditable, and traceable.

Leverage erodes with every uninformed concession. We map your commercial position, identify where enforcement mechanisms have degraded, and structure procurement so you retain control through transition and beyond.

When you need this

  • New system procurement
  • Replacement of legacy platforms
  • Vendor leverage eroding through concessions
  • Probity-assured vendor selection

What we deliver

  • Requirements specification
  • Evaluation criteria and weighted scoring
  • Evaluation report and recommendation
  • Contract negotiation support

Engagement model

SOW (time-boxed advisory)

Governance & assurance

Programme governance resets, assurance reviews, and reporting framework design. We diagnose structural governance failures — authority vacuums, compliance theatre, narrative capture — and design governance that actually governs.

Most programmes have two or three structural patterns active simultaneously. When they interact, they compound. A programme health check identifies which patterns are ticking and provides remediation priorities before the next one locks in.

When you need this

  • Governance artefacts not changing decisions
  • Authority gaps across programme roles
  • Vendor narrative ahead of yours at steering
  • Independent assurance review required

What we deliver

  • Governance framework and terms of reference
  • Reporting templates and cadence
  • Assurance review report
  • Recommendations with implementation support

Engagement model

SOW or fractional

Health IT integration

HL7/FHIR integration, electronic medical records, primary care network systems, medical imaging platforms. Technical oversight and vendor accountability for clinical system integrations.

Multi-vendor integration is where governance patterns compound fastest — transition cliffs, leverage erosion, and information fog all converge. We govern and assure the vendors who build, translating technical complexity into clear delivery decisions.

When you need this

  • Clinical system integration complexity
  • Vendors managing you with technical jargon
  • Interoperability challenges across systems
  • Legacy platform migration or replacement

What we deliver

  • Integration architecture review
  • Interface specification and oversight
  • Vendor technical governance framework
  • Interoperability compliance assessment

Engagement model

Embedded or advisory

Each service line can be engaged independently or combined for programme-wide coverage.

Discuss your requirements