What we deliver

Four service lines, mapped to how government writes tenders. Each engagement is scoped under Statement of Work with defined deliverables.

Service line 01

Programme / project delivery

Embedded delivery lead for complex programmes. From stabilisation through to completion. We take accountability for programme outcomes, not just activity.

Principal-led delivery. Every engagement is run directly by a senior practitioner with 20+ years of programme delivery across public and private sectors.

When you need this

  • Programme at risk or in recovery
  • Delivery lead gap on critical path
  • Complex multi-vendor coordination
  • Clinical system implementation

What we deliver

  • Programme plan and schedule
  • Risk register and escalation framework
  • Status reporting and stakeholder management
  • Vendor coordination and accountability

Engagement model

SOW, embedded, or fractional

Service line 02

Procurement advisory

Requirements definition, RFI/RFQ development, vendor evaluation, and contract negotiation for clinical systems and ICT. We design procurement processes that are defensible, auditable, and traceable.

Government procurement is about running a defensible process. We understand probity requirements and structure evaluations that withstand audit scrutiny.

When you need this

  • New system procurement
  • Replacement of legacy platforms
  • Evaluation panel support
  • Probity-assured vendor selection

What we deliver

  • Requirements specification
  • Evaluation criteria and weighted scoring
  • Evaluation report and recommendation
  • Contract negotiation support

Engagement model

SOW (time-boxed advisory)

Service line 03

Governance & assurance

Programme governance resets, assurance reviews, and reporting framework design. Governance structures must deliver value. We design ones that do.

The first step in any recovery engagement is an honest assessment of reporting quality. If steering committees are not making decisions from the reports they receive, the governance is failing.

When you need this

  • Programme governance ineffective
  • Steering committee not adding value
  • Reporting not decision-useful
  • Independent assurance review required

What we deliver

  • Governance framework and terms of reference
  • Reporting templates and cadence
  • Assurance review report
  • Recommendations with implementation support

Engagement model

SOW or fractional

Service line 04

Health IT integration

HL7/FHIR integration, electronic medical records, primary care network systems, medical imaging platforms. Technical oversight and vendor accountability for clinical system integrations.

We govern and assure the vendors who build. Because we understand the underlying architecture, we translate technical complexity into clear delivery decisions and hold vendors accountable to outcomes.

When you need this

  • Clinical system integration complexity
  • Vendors managing you with technical jargon
  • Interoperability challenges across systems
  • Legacy platform migration or replacement

What we deliver

  • Integration architecture review
  • Interface specification and oversight
  • Vendor technical governance framework
  • Interoperability compliance assessment

Engagement model

Embedded or advisory

Each service line can be engaged independently or combined for programme-wide coverage.

Discuss your requirements